Make (Integromat)
Visual automation platform for complex workflows.
Zapier vs Make (Integromat) at a Glance
| Feature | Zapier | Make (Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Connect your apps and automate workflows. | Visual automation platform for complex workflows. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free option | Yes | Yes |
| Our rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Current deal | Free Tier Available | Free Forever Plan |
| Tags | Automation, Integration, No-Code, Productivity | Automation, No-Code, Integration, Workflow |
Zapier: Pros and Cons
- 6000+ integrations
- Easy to use
- AI automation builder
- Tables feature
- Reliable
- Gets expensive quickly
- Limited free tier
Make (Integromat): Pros and Cons
- Visual workflow builder
- Complex logic support
- 1000+ integrations
- AI modules
- Generous free tier
- Steeper learning curve
- Can get expensive at scale
Choose Zapier if
Choose Zapier if you want to connect two apps in minutes without learning a visual canvas, or if you depend on a niche app that only Zapier supports. It is the better pick for non-technical teams that value reliability and a large library of ready-made templates. Pick it when ease and breadth of integrations matter more than cost per task.
Choose Make (Integromat) if
Choose Make if your automations need conditional paths, iterators, error handling, or multi-step data manipulation that would require many separate Zaps. It is the stronger pick for operations teams and agencies building elaborate workflows, and for anyone who wants a free forever plan with real capacity. Pick it when you are willing to climb a steeper learning curve for more power.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Zapier or Make?
Make is generally the cheaper option. Both are freemium, but Make advertises a free forever plan that its listing calls generous, while Zapier's free tier is limited and its paid plans are known to get expensive quickly as task volume grows. Make's pricing is based on operations, so complex scenarios still consume credits and it can get expensive at scale, but for the same workload most users find Make costs less than Zapier.
Is Make harder to use than Zapier?
Yes. Zapier walks you through a linear trigger-and-action setup that most people grasp immediately, and its AI builder can generate a Zap from a sentence. Make uses a visual canvas where modules connect in a flowchart, which is powerful but takes longer to learn. If you only need straightforward automations, Zapier's simplicity wins; if you build complex workflows, Make's learning curve pays off within a few projects.
Does Zapier have more integrations than Make?
Yes, Zapier lists more than 6000 app integrations compared with Make's 1000 or more. For mainstream tools such as Google Workspace, Slack, HubSpot, and Notion both platforms are well covered, so the gap matters mostly for niche or newer apps. Before choosing, check that the specific apps you rely on are supported on Make; if they are, its stronger logic and lower cost make it the better value.